<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tolerance and Universalism?  Thanks, I&#8217;ll Pass (III)</title>
	<link>http://larison.org/2006/07/02/tolerance-and-universalism-thanks-ill-pass-iii/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Eunomia &#187; Doubt And Certainty</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2006/07/02/tolerance-and-universalism-thanks-ill-pass-iii/#comment-8934</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2006/07/02/tolerance-and-universalism-thanks-ill-pass-iii/#comment-8934</guid>
					<description>[...] Scott Richert has more on the speech, noting the &#8220;fair-minded words&#8221; anecdote that Obama keeps recycling every time he is called on to address matters of faith and ethics, especially in connection with abortion. This is an anecdote he has been using and reinventing for years as the occasion requires it. This &#8220;fair-minded words&#8221; dodge is one of the oldest tricks in Obama&#8217;s book, which is how he can continue to portray himself as some sort of reasonable interlocutor, especially on those basic issues of human dignity and justice concerning the unborn on which he is among the least reasonable and most reflexive and ideological. Perhaps if Obama were more prone to doubt the ideological certainties that prompt him to oppose any and all restrictions on abortion, he might then seem like less of a caricature on this issue and more like the reasonable person he wants us to think he is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Scott Richert has more on the speech, noting the &#8220;fair-minded words&#8221; anecdote that Obama keeps recycling every time he is called on to address matters of faith and ethics, especially in connection with abortion. This is an anecdote he has been using and reinventing for years as the occasion requires it. This &#8220;fair-minded words&#8221; dodge is one of the oldest tricks in Obama&#8217;s book, which is how he can continue to portray himself as some sort of reasonable interlocutor, especially on those basic issues of human dignity and justice concerning the unborn on which he is among the least reasonable and most reflexive and ideological. Perhaps if Obama were more prone to doubt the ideological certainties that prompt him to oppose any and all restrictions on abortion, he might then seem like less of a caricature on this issue and more like the reasonable person he wants us to think he is. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eunomia &#187; Doubt And Certainty</title>
		<link>http://larison.org/2006/07/02/tolerance-and-universalism-thanks-ill-pass-iii/#comment-8935</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://larison.org/2006/07/02/tolerance-and-universalism-thanks-ill-pass-iii/#comment-8935</guid>
					<description>[...] Scott Richert has more on the speech, noting the &#8220;fair-minded words&#8221; anecdote that Obama keeps recycling every time he is called on to address matters of faith and ethics, especially in connection with abortion. This is an anecdote he has been using and reinventing for years as the occasion requires it. This &#8220;fair-minded words&#8221; dodge is one of the oldest tricks in Obama&#8217;s book, which is how he can continue to portray himself as some sort of reasonable interlocutor, especially on those basic issues of human dignity and justice concerning the unborn on which he is among the least reasonable and most reflexive and ideological. Perhaps if Obama were more prone to doubt the ideological certainties that prompt him to oppose any and all restrictions on abortion, he might then seem like less of a caricature on this issue and more like the reasonable person he wants us to think he is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Scott Richert has more on the speech, noting the &#8220;fair-minded words&#8221; anecdote that Obama keeps recycling every time he is called on to address matters of faith and ethics, especially in connection with abortion. This is an anecdote he has been using and reinventing for years as the occasion requires it. This &#8220;fair-minded words&#8221; dodge is one of the oldest tricks in Obama&#8217;s book, which is how he can continue to portray himself as some sort of reasonable interlocutor, especially on those basic issues of human dignity and justice concerning the unborn on which he is among the least reasonable and most reflexive and ideological. Perhaps if Obama were more prone to doubt the ideological certainties that prompt him to oppose any and all restrictions on abortion, he might then seem like less of a caricature on this issue and more like the reasonable person he wants us to think he is. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

